|
|
- leveldb Log format
- ==================
- The log file contents are a sequence of 32KB blocks. The only exception is that
- the tail of the file may contain a partial block.
-
- Each block consists of a sequence of records:
-
- block := record* trailer?
- record :=
- checksum: uint32 // crc32c of type and data[] ; little-endian
- length: uint16 // little-endian
- type: uint8 // One of FULL, FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST
- data: uint8[length]
-
- A record never starts within the last six bytes of a block (since it won't fit).
- Any leftover bytes here form the trailer, which must consist entirely of zero
- bytes and must be skipped by readers.
-
- Aside: if exactly seven bytes are left in the current block, and a new non-zero
- length record is added, the writer must emit a FIRST record (which contains zero
- bytes of user data) to fill up the trailing seven bytes of the block and then
- emit all of the user data in subsequent blocks.
-
- More types may be added in the future. Some Readers may skip record types they
- do not understand, others may report that some data was skipped.
-
- FULL == 1
- FIRST == 2
- MIDDLE == 3
- LAST == 4
-
- The FULL record contains the contents of an entire user record.
-
- FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST are types used for user records that have been split into
- multiple fragments (typically because of block boundaries). FIRST is the type
- of the first fragment of a user record, LAST is the type of the last fragment of
- a user record, and MIDDLE is the type of all interior fragments of a user
- record.
-
- Example: consider a sequence of user records:
-
- A: length 1000
- B: length 97270
- C: length 8000
-
- **A** will be stored as a FULL record in the first block.
-
- **B** will be split into three fragments: first fragment occupies the rest of
- the first block, second fragment occupies the entirety of the second block, and
- the third fragment occupies a prefix of the third block. This will leave six
- bytes free in the third block, which will be left empty as the trailer.
-
- **C** will be stored as a FULL record in the fourth block.
-
- ----
-
- ## Some benefits over the recordio format:
-
- 1. We do not need any heuristics for resyncing - just go to next block boundary
- and scan. If there is a corruption, skip to the next block. As a
- side-benefit, we do not get confused when part of the contents of one log
- file are embedded as a record inside another log file.
-
- 2. Splitting at approximate boundaries (e.g., for mapreduce) is simple: find the
- next block boundary and skip records until we hit a FULL or FIRST record.
-
- 3. We do not need extra buffering for large records.
-
- ## Some downsides compared to recordio format:
-
- 1. No packing of tiny records. This could be fixed by adding a new record type,
- so it is a shortcoming of the current implementation, not necessarily the
- format.
-
- 2. No compression. Again, this could be fixed by adding new record types.
|